Help Develop Canada’s 2025–2029 National Action Plan on Open Government
About Open Government
Open government means the government is transparent with information and accountable for decisions. It also means people are involved in making decisions. To do this, the government works with people, communities, businesses, and civil society.
Open government is based on the principles of transparency, accountability and public participation. Transparency means sharing the government’s data and information and making it easier for people to access them. Accountability means holding government responsible for their actions and decisions. Public participation means involving people in decisions about government policies and programs.
The Government of Canada is committed to being open.
About this consultation
The Government of Canada continually renews its approach to open government. We are now collecting insights from the public. These insights will help shape Canada’s next National Action Plan on Open Government 2025–2029 (NAP).
This is a chance for you to share your ideas and stories, and what matters to you most in open government. You can do so by completing the questionnaire below, participate in the Idea Board that you can access below and/or by submitting your ideas by email.
Phase 1 of the consultation will run until May 31, 2024.
The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat is committed to respecting the privacy of participants. All information created, held or collected by the department is protected by the Privacy Act. For more information on the Government of Canada’s Policy on Privacy Protection, consult the privacy notice.
About Open Government
Open government means the government is transparent with information and accountable for decisions. It also means people are involved in making decisions. To do this, the government works with people, communities, businesses, and civil society.
Open government is based on the principles of transparency, accountability and public participation. Transparency means sharing the government’s data and information and making it easier for people to access them. Accountability means holding government responsible for their actions and decisions. Public participation means involving people in decisions about government policies and programs.
The Government of Canada is committed to being open.
About this consultation
The Government of Canada continually renews its approach to open government. We are now collecting insights from the public. These insights will help shape Canada’s next National Action Plan on Open Government 2025–2029 (NAP).
This is a chance for you to share your ideas and stories, and what matters to you most in open government. You can do so by completing the questionnaire below, participate in the Idea Board that you can access below and/or by submitting your ideas by email.
Phase 1 of the consultation will run until May 31, 2024.
The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat is committed to respecting the privacy of participants. All information created, held or collected by the department is protected by the Privacy Act. For more information on the Government of Canada’s Policy on Privacy Protection, consult the privacy notice.
-
Share Idea Board – Meaningful and inclusive public participation on Facebook Share Idea Board – Meaningful and inclusive public participation on Twitter Share Idea Board – Meaningful and inclusive public participation on Linkedin Email Idea Board – Meaningful and inclusive public participation link
Idea Board – Meaningful and inclusive public participation
about 1 month agoThis Idea Board shares some of the ideas submitted by participants who have agreed to share their perspectives, on meaningful and inclusive public participation. They are answers to the following question:
1) What areas of government decision-making do you want to be more involved in?
Take a look and vote on the ideas that you support by clicking the ‘Like’ button.
Being-in-Canada3 days agodata policy development evaluation of the effectiveness of programs
0PamHan16 days agoIncome equity, wealth redistribution; universalism and the social safety net; poverty reduction - design and implementation of income...
supports (CRA-based benefits and cash-transfers, CDB, eg); electoral reform.
0Noneabout 1 month agoPipeline construction
0A Public Servant14 days agoService delivery priorities, approaches and investments. These have the most direct impact on peoples' lives and they should include the...
people they impact from the ideation through the implementation and review phases.
0Tracyabout 1 month agoAnything that more directly affects "local" or daily life such as where housing or commercial buildings...
will be constructed/neighbourhoods will be designed (eg. in regards to walkability, etc.), road maintenance, traffic, construction timelines, public transit, local programs + events, resources + programs offered by recreation centres, school curriculum, tuition costs, etc. I am also interested in more "federal" concerns such as climate change, our healthcare system, or cost of living but these are large issues that become difficult for me to navigate
1 -
Share Idea Board – Protecting civic space and democracy on Facebook Share Idea Board – Protecting civic space and democracy on Twitter Share Idea Board – Protecting civic space and democracy on Linkedin Email Idea Board – Protecting civic space and democracy link
Idea Board – Protecting civic space and democracy
about 1 month agoThis Idea Board shares some of the ideas submitted by participants who have agreed to share their perspectives, on protecting civic space and democracy. They are answers to the following questions:
1) What do you think are the biggest threats to civic space and democracy?
2) How can the government respond to threats to democracy and support a healthy, thriving civic space?
Take a look and vote on the ideas that you support by clicking the ‘Like’ button.
PamHan16 days agoEconomic disparity is the biggest threat. Mis/disinformation only works because of it. Corporate greed and lack of accountability allow...
profits to override human rights. Marketing is basically corporate-driven misinformation.
0Accountable Government29 days agoDepends on the nature of the threat..... Promoting open dialogue is a good start.
1Maya17 days ago3. Promote transparency
0Alex S.16 days agoNot suppression, but inoculation: highlight disinformation campaigns, their origins and their impacts, including "telltale signs".
Disinformation campaigns are successful because they tell people what they want to hear. But nobody wants to be seen by others as a fool. Disinformation campaigns can usually be debunked when facts and consequences become apparent. A publicly maintained resource for that, like Snopes.com, is an extension of librarianism, a facility that the public can consult to review and discredit sources of disinformation. But to be diplomatic, it must be non partisan, and highlight successful, as well as unsuccessful disinformation campaigns, and it MUST name perpetrators / originators (including organized foreign state and non-state actors, intended targets, and the presumed and actual objectives of each campaign, as well as consequences, if any.
1Concerned citizen23 days agoDo not use governing party's powers to suppress alternate views or actions.
0 -
Share Idea Board – Anti-corruption, public confidence and corporate transparency on Facebook Share Idea Board – Anti-corruption, public confidence and corporate transparency on Twitter Share Idea Board – Anti-corruption, public confidence and corporate transparency on Linkedin Email Idea Board – Anti-corruption, public confidence and corporate transparency link
This Idea Board shares some of the ideas submitted by participants who have agreed to share their perspectives, on anti-corruption, public confidence and corporate transparency. They are answers to the following questions:
1) What are your biggest concerns with corporate corruption and transparency in Canada?
2) What can the government do to increase your trust in it?
Take a look and vote on the ideas that you support by clicking the ‘Like’ button.
Bryan16 days agohave you looked at our Telephone plans lately? everything is owned by the big three companies. Have you looked at our cable/internet...
services lately? It's insanely segregated. Power supply is exactly the same. there is little doubt that there is corruption in the ranks.
0Robert Duhaime15 days agoMy biggest concerns are that our government is more concerned with their big money players rather than the concerns of the working and...
middle classes. We all know from economic history that the lower classes have had pretty much stagnant wages over the last 40 years. Nothing any government has done has dramatically changed that. The rich continue to get richer. Beyond that though I find that our corporations are too conservative. They tend to get locked into cycles that lack innovation and get into a "we've always done it this way" mindset. I think there should be incentives for companies to have large R&D budgets.
0A Public Servant14 days agoMake legislative changes, which are long overdue. Stop relying on facile arguments about protecting businesses: openness promotes...
competition, which is sorely lacking in most major industries in Canada.
0@ChrystiaC7 days agoIts can't because its not willing to divorce itself from itself to allow Canadians to believe in a national mission. Just because a...
political party is elected as the 'government', doesn't mean the government, or aka the public service, which is what this survey is really about, has the leadership and vision to create an authentic relationship with Canadians. Trust? What does this look, feel and mean for Indigenous peoples? What does authenticity look like for the taxpayer?
0Kris7 days agoTo begin, acknowledge that our input means something. As I noted above, I occasionally write to my federal representative (Kayabaga).
Yet I have never received even an acknowledgement. So, I how do I know she is even listening? I am also extremely frustrated when I hear about government wasting money -on poorly designed programs, giving away millions (CERB) to people that really weren't qualified, or handing millions over to contractors, as it did with the ArriveCAN app, for something that could have been designed for thousands. It makes the government seem incompetent. And in those cases, at least, whoever was involved, certain was. BTW - the pandemic is no excuse for that.
0 -
Share Idea Board – Designing inclusive government programs and services on Facebook Share Idea Board – Designing inclusive government programs and services on Twitter Share Idea Board – Designing inclusive government programs and services on Linkedin Email Idea Board – Designing inclusive government programs and services link
Idea Board – Designing inclusive government programs and services
about 1 month agoThis Idea Board shares some of the ideas submitted by participants who have agreed to share their perspectives, on designing inclusive government programs and services. They are answers to the following questions:
1) What inclusion barriers do you experience with government programs and/or services?
2) How can government reduce inclusion barriers to government programs and/or services?
Take a look and vote on the ideas that you support by clicking the ‘Like’ button.
Frenglish Betty16 days agoMake them work
0Porteouvert16 days agoSocial workers, who provide assistance for those in need to access services and programs they could benefit from, are overworked and...
underpaid. And they are dofficult to access in a timely manner. Therefore the main barrier I and my family have faced is the lack of available social workers. Once a worker was assigned, they barely followed up at all.m other than to provide phone nimbers to charities and agencies and these phone numbers were largnely outdated or no longer in service. It is a really disheartening experience to work hard to get a social worker only tonfind that they are basically overworked to the point of being useless to you when you need help the most.
0Danielle Oderson10 days agoDisability tax credit. Once a person is on WSIB they should automatically be enrolled into disability tax credit for the time they’re on...
WSIB. Asking a person who had a mental breakdown to fill out these forms with their doctors, when most doctors struggle with & are unable to fill out these forms properly creates barriers for those entitled to it but unable to file properly for it. Being an immigrant who has to rely on draws for family reunification it’s much harder for immigrants separated from their families
0Jordan16 days agovery little
0Alex S.16 days agoKey barriers are economic: are parliamentarians and civil servants cognizant of the costs faced by clients of social programs? Are...
benefits actively modeled and tested for feasibility under real-world conditions, particularly at the interfaces of programs like EI, and resumption of employment? How do various programs offered by different levels of government combine and interact? How are the jolly words of politicians living well above the poverty line actually play out for those living at or below it? These programs need to be tested by the experiences of staffers living under those conditions, and improved by the results of that testing and simulation, and NOT just as a public relations exercise when rolling out a new program at election time; there should be some publicly reported objective scoring (50% of testers of this funding program ran out of funds 5 days before their next infusion of funds. The most frequentLy occurring cases were in the following postal codes...)
0 -
Share Idea Board – Anything else on Facebook Share Idea Board – Anything else on Twitter Share Idea Board – Anything else on Linkedin Email Idea Board – Anything else link
Idea Board – Anything else
about 1 month agoThis Idea Board shares some of the ideas submitted by participants who have agreed to share their perspectives, on other topics related to open government. They are answers to the following questions:
1) What areas of government would you like to see more transparency on, participation in and accountability on?
2) What additional actions should Canada take to increase transparency, participation and accountability?
Take a look and vote on the ideas that you support by clicking the ‘Like’ button.
bobbyTabout 1 month agoCanada should have a framework to make petitions into ballot initiatives that would be automatically voted on, if a petition gets a...
certain amount of signatures. The federal budget needs to be consulted on before delivered.
0Tracyabout 1 month ago2. Transportation - Public transit is embarrassingly poor and becomes a running joke between Canadians...
I live just outside a city that has the most developed transit system in the area and the system often has delays or large portions of it are shutdown during the day. Some methods are so slow that it's faster to walk. The transit in the city I live in rarely comes and is one of the reasons why my city is entirely car-centric. This also leads into the dreadful issue of traffic. In my last municipal election, every single candidate promised to address the issue of traffic and yet I've seen no improvement since then (Transit or otherwise). I have seen some efforts in improving transit over trivial matters but the larger problems continue and I have not heard of any plans or progress made to change that.
1Christian (Open North)9 days ago2) Quality Gender data, particularly intersections with Indigenous populations - currently data in Territories and remote contexts is of...
really poor quality
0Anonymous10 days agoPrivacy and protection of personal info
0Anonymous3 days agoAll new registries (such as the beneficial ownership registry) should default to being open - open data, open standards, open APIs.
0
CONTACT US
TIMELINE
-
Phase 1: Collecting Ideas – Spring 2024 - March 27 to May 31, 2024
Help Develop Canada’s 2025–2029 National Action Plan on Open Government is currently at this stageCollection of ideas from Canadians about open government.
-
Phase 2: Data Coding and Analysis – Spring 2024
this is an upcoming stage for Help Develop Canada’s 2025–2029 National Action Plan on Open GovernmentCompilation and analysis of ideas received from Canadians: identification of open government priorities to be included in Canada's 2025-2029 NAP.
-
Phase 3: Thematic Workshops – Summer 2024
this is an upcoming stage for Help Develop Canada’s 2025–2029 National Action Plan on Open GovernmentThematic workshops bring together members of civil society, key stakeholders and government organizations, to review input received and develop government initiatives on open government.
-
Phase 4: Commitments Review – Fall 2024
this is an upcoming stage for Help Develop Canada’s 2025–2029 National Action Plan on Open GovernmentConsultation with Canadians on this platform, on proposed open government commitments for Canada’s 2025-2029 NAP, identified in Phase 3.
-
Phase 5: Drafting of Canada's 2025-2029 NAP – Winter and Spring 2025
this is an upcoming stage for Help Develop Canada’s 2025–2029 National Action Plan on Open GovernmentDevelopment of the ''What We Heard Report'' and Canada's 2025-2029 NAP.
-
Phase 6: Publication - August 2025
this is an upcoming stage for Help Develop Canada’s 2025–2029 National Action Plan on Open GovernmentPresentation of the ''What We Heard Report'' and Canada's 2025-2029 NAP to the Open Government Partnership.